Coinsillium CEO thinks CBDCs are a small niche as opposed to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
The development of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is accelerating, but Coinsillium CEO Eddy Travia is unconcerned since he believes they fail to provide customers with an advantage over existing private crypto choices.
Coinsillium is an open finance venture operator concentrating in blockchain technology, particularly non-fungible coins, which the company anticipates could soon be used for more commercial reasons such as ticketing and data storage.
According to the Atlantic Council, 11 nations have initiated a CBDC initiative, 14 are running pilots, 26 are actively developing the concept, and 47 are exploring it.
Despite this, the subject is still very polarizing; reasons against include how they may diminish personal privacy and the cyberattack danger posed on a national level.
The Coinsillium CEO thinks CBDCs are a small niche and also thinks of them as a second fiddle to Bitcoin.
It’s A Second Fiddle To BTC
Travia stated that unfavorable media coverage of digital assets – which appears to acquire more prominence – frequently unduly impacted political intentions in the push for CBDCs and the related limitations against crypto.
This phenomenon can impact politicians’ thinking, particularly as some may see the sector as a snake pit that needs to be regulated against or opposed by CBDCs.
Travia hypothesized that the demand for CBDCs solves the requirement to adapt and future-proof money while providing a high level of control – something that private cryptocurrencies cannot do.
“They are looking at CBDCs because, again, CBDCs are something they can control, and they feel they can impose certain rules.”
However, when asked about China’s CBDC, the Coinsillium CEO stated that the initiative is “not doing so well” since current and established payment methods, such as Alipay or WeChat Pay, are quite comparable to the digital yuan from a user/front-end standpoint. As a result, it makes little difference to customers.
Travia stated that private cryptocurrencies will play just a “limited niche” in the future of money since they have no “obvious advantage” over them.
“In that world of thousands of crypto coins, I think that CBDCs have a very small niche to play because, where is the clear advantage for consumers?”
One advantage may be rivalry between central banks and retail banks, which Travia views as potentially beneficial to customers.
A Dystopian Nightmare
At the other end of the spectrum, there is rising worry about CBDCs as a dystopian instrument. Shapeshift CEO Erik Voorhees, for example, described them as an Orwellian spy surveillance nightmare on the gm podcast in February.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) General Manager Agustin Carsen recently stated that “the spirit of money” belongs to trust, and only central banks can be trusted.
Voorhees, like Travia, pointed out that CBDCs are simply repackaged fiat currencies with no discernible benefit to consumers. Furthermore, they are ideologically hostile to core aspects of cryptocurrencies, such as decentralization, transparency, and trustlessness.
“No one who’s in crypto likes CBDCs. No one who understands the value of cryptocurrency likes CBDCs at all.”
Check out the latest crypto news.
DC Forecasts is a leader in many crypto news categories, striving for the highest journalistic standards and abiding by a strict set of editorial policies. If you are interested to offer your expertise or contribute to our news website, feel free to contact us at [email protected]
Discussion about this post